Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.7 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is slightly better than the Motorola Moto G200 5G, having a 90.6 score against 86.2. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3's body is much thinner but a lot heavier than the Motorola Moto G200 5G, and both were only released with a couple months difference. Both of these phones use the same Android 11 OS (operating system).
The Moto G200 5G features a bit better looking screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2460px and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite higher display density. The Motorola Moto G200 5G's processor is just as good as Galaxy Z Fold 3's CPU, and although the Motorola Moto G200 5G has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G200 5G, because it has more internal storage capacity. Moto G200 5G counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a bigger aperture and a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
The Moto G200 5G has a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.