Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2020-12-05 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Electric violet and Metallic sage |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 1640 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 263 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.7 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much better than the Moto G9 Power, with a 90.6 score against 78.6. Although the Galaxy Z Fold 3 and the Moto G9 Power were only released 8 months apart, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 design is somewhat heavier but noticeably thinner than the Moto G9 Power. Both devices in our current comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Fold 3 has newer 11 version and Moto G9 Power has Android 10 version.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with just a little better processing power than Moto G9 Power, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a more vivid screen than Moto G9 Power, because it has a lot better 1768 x 2208 pixels resolution, a higher screen density and a bit bigger display.
Motorola Moto G9 Power has slightly more memory for games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Moto G9 Power counts with a very superior battery performance than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
The Moto G9 Power has a way better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a bigger aperture for better low-light photography and video and a back facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.