Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2016-07-28 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 is better than the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, with a 90.6 score against 76.4. Although the Galaxy Z Fold 3 is way heavier than the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, it's thinner and incredibly newer. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a little faster processor than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has more processing cores and a greater amount of RAM.
The Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a really smaller screen and a bit lower 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution, it also counts with a higher number of pixels per inch of display. The Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a better storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has improved battery life than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh. The Moto Z Force Droid Edition shoots greater photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a larger aperture and a way more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.