Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much better than the Motorola One Hyper, having a 90.6 score against 79.8. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 design is newer and way thinner, but much heavier than the Motorola One Hyper. Both phones we compare here have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding that.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a bit better performance than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Z Fold 3 and Motorola One Hyper count with similar screens, because although the Motorola One Hyper has a much lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better quantity of pixels per screen inch.
The Motorola One Hyper features more storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a bit superior battery life than Motorola One Hyper, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola One Hyper captures a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a back camera with way more mega pixels and a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.