Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 75.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-08-11 | 2019-09-30 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.29 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Charcoal, Cyan green and Ice |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.7 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 is better than the Nokia 7.2, getting a 90.6 score against 75.9. These devices have Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Fold 3 has 11 version and Nokia 7.2 has Android 10 version. Even though the Galaxy Z Fold 3 is incredibly heavier than the Nokia 7.2, it's extremely thinner and also newer.
The Nokia 7.2 counts with a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a way lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit greater number of pixels in each inch of screen. Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a bit better processing unit than Nokia 7.2, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Nokia 7.2 takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a larger camera aperture to capture better images and video in low light environments and a camera in the back with a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution. The Nokia 7.2 features a little bit better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with better battery duration than Nokia 7.2, because it has a 4400mAh battery size against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.