Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 77.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2021-11-09 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.75 x 3.14 x 0.36 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 7.65 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Midnight Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | -- |
| 7.7 | 8.36 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4470mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a general score of 90.6, which is much better than the Nokia X100's overall score of 77.3. Even though Galaxy Z Fold 3 and the Nokia X100 were only released with a couple months difference, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 body is heavier but also much thinner. Both phones in this comparison review have the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't see any difference regarding operating system features.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a bit better hardware performance than Nokia X100, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a greater amount of RAM. The Nokia X100 and Galaxy Z Fold 3 feature extremely similar displays, because although the Nokia X100 has a quite lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite better display density.
The Nokia X100 counts with a bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Nokia X100 has just a little better battery duration than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has 4470mAh of battery capacity.
The Nokia X100 has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a much more mega-pixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.