Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-08-11 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a global score of 90.6, which is a bit better than Galaxy A50s's general score of 86.6. Even though Galaxy Z Fold 3 is extremely heavier than Galaxy A50s, it's thinner and also newer. These phones have Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Fold 3 has 11 version and Galaxy A50s has Android 10, so it provides a couple nice extra features.
Galaxy A50s features a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a way lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a quite greater pixel amount per inch of screen. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A50s has just a bit bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bit superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a 10 percent larger battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a bigger aperture to take better photography and videos in low light environments and a much more megapixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.