Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Prism bricks black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 372 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a score of 92.9, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3's overall score of 90.6. Despite of the fact the Galaxy A71 5G UW is older and incredibly thicker than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, it's construction is still extremely lighter. Both phones in this review have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A71 5G UW has the older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has Android 11.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a little sharper display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little greater count of pixels in each screen inch.
Galaxy A71 5G UW has a lot better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a bigger aperture for better photography in low-light situations and a much more mega pixels back-facing camera. Galaxy A71 5G UW has a better memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.