Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 372 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.7 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a bit better than Galaxy F62, with a 90.6 score against 88.1. Even though Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 and Galaxy F62 were released with only a couple of months difference, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3's design is somewhat heavier but also a lot thinner than Galaxy F62. Both devices in this review come with the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't see any differences regarding that.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a little faster processor than Galaxy F62, because it has 6 GB more RAM and a larger number of cores. The Galaxy F62 features a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better count of pixels in each inch of display.
The Galaxy F62 features a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a bigger camera aperture for better photos and videos in low-light environments and a back camera with way more mega-pixels. Galaxy F62 has a bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy F62 features a much better battery performance than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity instead of 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.