Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 372 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 has a global score of 90.8, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy Z Fold 3's overall score of 90.6. Galaxy Note 20 is an older and thicker phone than the Galaxy Z Fold 3, but Samsung could make it lighter anyway. Galaxy Note 20 has a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher pixels density.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a much bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy Note 20, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Note 20 has a processing unit that is very similar to Galaxy Z Fold 3's processing unit, and although the Galaxy Note 20 has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Galaxy Note 20 shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have a same resolution camera, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a bigger diafragm aperture. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a bit better battery performance than Galaxy Note 20, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.