Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 98.9, which is a bit better than the Galaxy Z Fold 3's 90.6 general score. Although Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is older and way thicker than the Galaxy Z Fold 3, it's design is still lighter. Both phones we are comparing use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has newer 13 version while Galaxy Z Fold 3 has Android 11, offering some extra features and increased performance.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 12 GB RAM memory. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit sharper display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a slightly better 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots greater photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels and a bigger camera aperture for better low light images and video. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a quite bigger memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 2% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.