Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.24 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has an overall score of 90.6, which is much better than Galaxy Note 3's 81.2 global score. These devices have Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a more recent 11 version while Galaxy Note 3 has Android 5.0 version. Even though Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a lot heavier than Galaxy Note 3, it's way thinner and a lot newer.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a way smaller display and a way worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px, it also counts with a little bit better pixel quantity in each display inch. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with a greater number of cores and a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy Note 3 shoots much better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have a F2.2 aperture, the Galaxy Note 3 also has a more MP camera. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a superior battery duration than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.