Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.7 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is better than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, getting a 90.6 score against 80.4. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a incredibly newer and somewhat thinner device than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, although it is also a lot heavier. Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a quite lower 1440 x 2560 resolution and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a higher screen density. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have the same resolution back camera, the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition also has a way bigger camera aperture for better photos and videos in low-light environments.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has much more storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a very superior battery duration than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.