Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a general score of 90.6, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy Note10's 89 global score. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 body is newer and thinner, but notably heavier than Galaxy Note10. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note10, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has 4 GB more RAM.
Galaxy Note10 features just a bit better screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a lot worse resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen. The Galaxy Note10 features as much storage capacity for apps and games as the Galaxy Z Fold 3 one, they have exactly the same internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has a 26 percent bigger battery size. Samsung Galaxy Note10 takes much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have a same resolution back camera, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has a much bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.