Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, getting a 90.6 score against 86.2. Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a newer and notably thinner cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, although it's incredibly heavier. Both of these phones work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so they should provide the user very similar operating system features.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy Note10 Lite, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a higher amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a little smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a just a little higher pixels density.
Galaxy Note10 Lite has a much better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have the same resolution back camera, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also has a way bigger aperture to take better images in low light environments. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a quite bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 2 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.