Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a score of 90.6, which is better than the Galaxy Note3's 77.7 global score. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 construction is notably newer and much thinner than the Galaxy Note3's, although it is also way heavier. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has older 11 version while Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because although it has a just a bit lower display pixels density, it also counts with a lot larger display and a better 1768 x 2208px resolution. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a higher number of cores (and also faster).
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a much better storage for apps and games than Galaxy Note3, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a superior battery duration than Galaxy Note3, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note3 features a way better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note3 also has a more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.