Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 372 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a global score of 90.6, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite's 89.7 score. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3's design is newer and much thinner than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite's, although it's extremely heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a quite higher pixel amount in each display inch.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a better memory for apps and games than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1000 GB. Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a greater camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a larger aperture to capture better photography in poorly lited environments and a back camera with lot more MP. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.