Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a bit better than the Galaxy Z Fold 3, getting a score of 95.4 against 90.6. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra construction is somewhat lighter but way thicker than the Galaxy Z Fold 3, and both of them were only released 7 months apart. These phones come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has the newer 13 version while Galaxy Z Fold 3 has Android 11 version, giving you some extra features and optimized performance.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels density and a little bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels. Galaxy Z Fold 3 features much more storage for games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bit better CPU than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture for better photography in low-light situations and a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.