Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a general score of 90.6, which is better than Galaxy XCover Pro's global score of 81. These devices use the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't notice any difference regarding operating system features. Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a newer and a lot thinner phone than the Galaxy XCover Pro, although it's also heavier.
Galaxy XCover Pro has a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a quite smaller display and a way lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a quite higher screen density. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a greater memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy XCover Pro captures greater photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels and a much bigger aperture for better low light photos and video.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a bit superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 9% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.