Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, getting a 90.6 score against 88.5. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3's construction is newer and somewhat thinner than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's, but it's heavier. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has an older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has Android 12.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's processor is very similar to Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3's processing unit, and although the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Galaxy Z Flip has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2636, it also counts with a quite better screen density.
The Galaxy Z Flip's memory capacity to store more games and applications is just as good as the Galaxy Z Fold 3 one, they have the same 256 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy Z Fold 3 has improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 33% more battery capacity. The Galaxy Z Flip takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have a 12 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger aperture to take better low-light photography and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.