Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 7.7 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a score of 90.6, which is a bit better than the Galaxy Z Flip 3's 85.6 overall score. Even though Galaxy Z Fold 3 and Galaxy Z Flip 3 were released only 0 months apart, Galaxy Z Fold 3's body is a little bit thinner but noticeably heavier. Both phones in this review come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding operating system features.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a bit faster processor than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has more RAM. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a little smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2636px, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the display.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a very superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity. Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with better battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have a 12 mega-pixels resolution camera, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a larger aperture for better low light images and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.