Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is a little bit better than Galaxy Z Fold 3's overall score of 90.6. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 design is older, a little bit thicker and a little heavier than the Galaxy Z Fold 3. Both phones in this review come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't notice any difference in that aspect.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3. Both of them have the same display density, a display with the same size and the same 1768 x 2208 resolution. Galaxy Z Fold 2's memory capacity for games and applications is very similar to Galaxy Z Fold 3's one, both of them have equal 256 GB internal memory.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3. They have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM amount. Galaxy Z Fold 2 captures way better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have a back camera with a 12 MP resolution, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better captures in low light situations.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a little longer battery duration than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.