Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2017-06-01 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.14 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Black, Pink, Red and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 801 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3230mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has an overall score of 90.6, which is better than the Sony Xperia XZ Premium's general score of 79.8. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3's design is noticeably newer and thinner than the Sony Xperia XZ Premium's, although it is a lot heavier. Xperia XZ Premium counts with a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a way better 2160 x 3840 resolution and a much better quantity of pixels per screen inch.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Xperia XZ Premium, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has 8 GB more RAM. The Sony Xperia XZ Premium counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a much better resolution camera and a larger aperture.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a way better battery life than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.