Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2018-07-30 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 760 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a score of 90.6, which is much better than Xperia XZ2 Premium's 82.2 score. Galaxy Z Fold 3's construction is incredibly newer and thinner than Xperia XZ2 Premium's, but it's heavier. The Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with a lot better looking display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better number of pixels per inch in the screen and a lot higher 2160 x 3840 resolution.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bit superior processing unit than Xperia XZ2 Premium, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a better storage to store more apps and games than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with superior battery lifetime than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity. Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium features a lot better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a back facing camera with a much higher resolution and a larger diafragm aperture for better captures in low light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.