Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-08-11 | 2019-11-20 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Aurora green, Glacier white and Midnight black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 377.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 13.09 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a global score of 90.6, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Note 10's 83.7 overall score. Even though Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is way heavier than the Xiaomi Mi Note 10, it's incredibly thinner and also newer. Both phones in this review come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has 11 version and Xiaomi Mi Note 10 has Android 10, so it provides a couple nice extra features.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a bit more powerful processor than Xiaomi Mi Note 10, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a higher amount of RAM. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 counts with just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a way lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite higher pixels density.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 has a lot better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a camera with a much better resolution and a much larger aperture to take better photography and video in low-light situations. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has much more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note 10, because it has more internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 counts with improved battery performance than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has 5260mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.