Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 80.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2020-05-09 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Glacier white, Midnight black and Nebula purple |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 377.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much better than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, with a 90.6 score against 80.6. Both devices in this review include the same Android 11 OS. Although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is noticeably heavier than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, it's noticeably thinner and also newer. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a lot worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a little better display density.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite captures a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and video in low-light environments and a camera with a way higher resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a superior storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite counts with longer battery duration than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 20 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.