| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-08-11 | 2016-11-01 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.15 x 3.04 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Black and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 516.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 7.7 | 8.69 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4070mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a general score of 90.6, which is better than Xiaomi Mi Note 2's 76 score. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has the older 11 version while Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a notably newer and somewhat thinner phone than the Xiaomi Mi Note 2, although it is also noticeably heavier.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because although it has a little worse screen density, it also counts with a really larger display and a higher 1768 x 2208 resolution. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has 4 more cores and 6 GB more RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photos and videos in low-light situations and a back camera with a way higher 23 mega-pixels resolution. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has more internal memory.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a little longer battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has an 8 percent more battery size.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.