Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a general score of 90.6, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro's overall score of 87.9. Although Galaxy Z Fold 3 is somewhat heavier than the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, it's incredibly thinner and also newer. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Fold 3 has newer 11 version while Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has Android 10.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bit better processor than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has more RAM memory. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel density.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a bigger aperture and a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution camera in the back. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a very superior memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 4700mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.