Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2020-02-11 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is better than the Xiaomi Poco X2, getting a 90.6 score against 79.3. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 body is newer and much thinner, but much heavier than Xiaomi Poco X2. Both of these phones have the same Android 11 OS (operating system). Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a bit better processing unit than Xiaomi Poco X2, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Poco X2 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 count with similar screens, because although the Xiaomi Poco X2 has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the screen. Xiaomi Poco X2 shoots greater photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a bigger aperture and a camera in the back with lot more megapixels.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a much better memory to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Poco X2, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Poco X2 counts with a little longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.