Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2021-03-24 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has an overall score of 90.6, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro's 82.4 general score. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3's body is heavier but notably thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, and both of them were released only 5 months apart. Both devices we are comparing here use the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so both of them should count with very similar operating system features.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a bit better processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little higher screen density.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro captures much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a bigger aperture for better low light images and a back camera with way more MP. Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with more memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a little better battery duration than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.