| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 13 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2024-01-15 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.34 x 2.95 x 28.98 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | -- |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Forest Green, Lavender Purple and Midnight Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 7.7 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a score of 90.6, which is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro's 77.1 general score. Both devices we compare here use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has the previous 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has Android 13. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro features a much better display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a quite higher pixel quantity per screen inch.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro counts with a superior memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have the same 256 GB internal storage, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1 TB. Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a much more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has more RAM.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a back camera with a much higher 200 mega-pixels resolution and a lot larger aperture to take better low light images. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro counts with a little longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.