Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2019-01-15 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.7 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, with a general score of 90.6 against 80.3. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3's body is incredibly newer and incredibly thinner, but a lot heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 has a bit sharper display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a way lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a little greater number of pixels per screen inch.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a slightly better storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has more RAM memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 shoots greater photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a much higher resolution camera in the back and a bigger camera aperture to capture better images and video in low-light environments. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a little better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.