Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, with a 90.6 score against 81.1. Galaxy Z Fold 3's construction is newer and way thinner, but also much heavier than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a newer 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has Android 10 version.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 both count with incredibly similar displays, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a bit worse 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixel count in each inch of display.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 features more memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a bit superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 14% greater battery capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro shoots a lot better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a back camera with a much better 64 mega pixels resolution and a larger camera aperture to capture better low light photography and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.