Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has an overall score of 90.6, which is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's general score of 79. These phones come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so they should provide you very similar operating system features. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 body is newer and a lot thinner, but incredibly heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S and Galaxy Z Fold 3 feature very similar screens, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a quite lower 1080 x 2400px resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite better pixels number per display inch. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features just a little better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a larger aperture for better photography and video in poorly lited situations and a back facing camera with way more MP. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 14 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.