Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| -- | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 5.7 inches |
| -- | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Plus (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| -- | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is better than Galaxy Z Fold 4, with an 81.2 score against 73.4. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has the older 5.0 version while Galaxy Z Fold 4 has Android 12 version. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a much better hardware performance than Galaxy Z Fold 4, because although it has less cpu cores and 9 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a graphics processing unit.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4, although it has a quite lower screen pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 has much more storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4. Galaxy Note 3 features a much better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 4, although it has a way worse resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.