Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-11-18 |
| -- | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.13 ounces |
| -- | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 6.8 inches |
| -- | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| -- | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.35 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G200 5G is much better than Galaxy Z Fold 6, with a overall score of 86.2 against 73.9. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but Motorola Moto G200 5G has an older 11 version while Galaxy Z Fold 6 has Android 14. The Moto G200 5G has a much better processing power than Galaxy Z Fold 6, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Moto G200 5G has a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6. The Galaxy Z Fold 6 has a much bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Moto G200 5G, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity. Moto G200 5G has just a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Moto G200 5G has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a camera in the back with way more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.