Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| -- | 2016-09-01 |
| -- | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| -- | 5.75 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 5.5 inches |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| -- | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto Z Force has a score of 75.8, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy Z Fold 6's 73.9 overall score. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS, but Moto Z Force has the newer 7.0 Nougat version while Galaxy Z Fold 6 has Android 14. Moto Z Force features a much better performing processor than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6, although it has lesser processing cores and lesser RAM memory.
Moto Z Force counts with a way better looking display than Galaxy Z Fold 6. The Motorola Moto Z Force captures a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 6, although it has a camera in the back with lot less megapixels resolution, they both have the same aperture. The Moto Z Force counts with a quite bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy Z Fold 6 counts with longer battery duration than Moto Z Force, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.