Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2019-12-27 |
| -- | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.07 ounces |
| -- | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 6.5 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6, having a global score of 85.5 against 73.9. Both devices in this comparison use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A51 has 11 version and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 has Android 14 version. The Galaxy A51 has a much greater performance than Galaxy Z Fold 6, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Galaxy A51 counts with an incredibly better display than Galaxy Z Fold 6. Galaxy A51 takes greater photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 6, although it has a lower 48 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera and a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low-light photos and video. The Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy Z Fold 6 has just a little better battery duration than Galaxy A51, because it has a 4400mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.