Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-21 |
| -- | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 7.34 ounces |
| -- | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 6.9 inches |
| -- | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| -- | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way better than the Galaxy Z Fold 6, with a 98.9 score against 73.9. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has older 13 version while Galaxy Z Fold 6 has Android 14 version. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a lot better performance than Galaxy Z Fold 6. Both of them have a 12 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a lot better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a quite bigger memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4400mAh. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots way better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a way higher resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.