Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 15 | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| -- | 2019-09-20 |
| -- | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 7.97 ounces |
| Crafted Black, Navy, Pink, Silver Shadow and White | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| -- | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| -- | 456 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.57") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max is much better than Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), having an 85.3 score against 74.8. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max works with iOS 15.x OS, while Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored) comes with Android 15 OS. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max features a much better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), because although it has less RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has an incredibly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), although it has a bit smaller display and much more opaque display. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), although it has a way tinier back camera sensor giving a lot worse image quality and a way less megapixels resolution camera in the back, they both have a F1.8 camera aperture.
Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored) has much more memory capacity to install games and applications than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored) features just a bit better battery duration than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.