Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 15 | -- |
| -- | 2017-09-22 |
| -- | 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 7.13 ounces |
| Crafted Black, Navy, Pink, Silver Shadow and White | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 949.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| -- | 401 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.57") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 8 Plus has an overall score of 87.1, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored)'s 74.8 global score. Apple iPhone 8 Plus has a much better performing processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), because although it has 9 GB less RAM memory and a lower number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
IPhone 8 Plus has a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), although it has a lot smaller display and much worse brightness. Apple iPhone 8 Plus has as much storage to store more games and applications as the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored) one, both have equal internal storage.
The Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored) has a way better battery duration than iPhone 8 Plus, because it has a 4400mAh battery size. IPhone 8 Plus captures clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), although it has a camera with a lot worse resolution and a much tinier back-facing camera sensor capturing much worse quality videos and images, they both have a same size aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.