Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 15 | Android 5.0 |
| -- | 2015-03-01 |
| -- | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| -- | 5.54 ounces |
| Crafted Black, Navy, Pink, Silver Shadow and White | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5 inches |
| -- | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| -- | 441 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 4.8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.57") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.24 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), having a 77.7 score against 74.8. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but HTC One M9 has the older 5.0 version while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored) has Android 15. HTC One M9 counts with a lot better looking display than Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), although it has a much smaller display.
The HTC One M9 has a much better performing processing unit than Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), because although it has 9 GB less RAM, and they both have 8 processing cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an extra graphics processing unit and a 64 bits processing unit. The Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored) has much more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC One M9, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage capacity.
The HTC One M9 counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), although it has a much tinier back camera sensor taking lot worse quality images and videos, a camera with a way worse 20 mega pixels resolution and a tinier diafragm aperture. The Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored) counts with a way better battery life than HTC One M9, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity instead of 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.