Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 15 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| -- | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| -- | 5.57 ounces |
| Crafted Black, Navy, Pink, Silver Shadow and White | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6 inches |
| -- | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| -- | 537 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.57") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored)'s overall score of 74.8. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a way better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
LG V35 ThinQ has a lot better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), although it has a really smaller screen. LG V35 ThinQ has a bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB.
LG V35 ThinQ's camera is just as good as Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored)'s camera, because although the LG V35 ThinQ has a much less megapixels resolution camera and a lot smaller camera sensor capturing lot worse quality pictures, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better photos and video in low light situations.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored) counts with better battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.