Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 15 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| -- | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 5.96 ounces |
| Crafted Black, Navy, Pink, Silver Shadow and White | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| -- | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| -- | 537 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.57") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ is a little bit better than the Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), with a general score of 81.2 against 74.8. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but LG V40 ThinQ has the previous 10 version while Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored) has Android 15. The LG V40 ThinQ has an incredibly better screen than Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), although it has a little bit smaller display.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a really superior processing power than Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. LG V40 ThinQ has a better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored) features greater battery lifetime than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 4400mAh battery size. LG V40 ThinQ has a slightly better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), because although it has a much smaller sensor capturing less light and dull colors and a camera with much less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture for better images in poorly lited environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.