Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 15 | -- |
| -- | 2019-09-05 |
| -- | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 6.70 ounces |
| Crafted Black, Navy, Pink, Silver Shadow and White | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| -- | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| -- | 403 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.57") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Zoom has a score of 80, which is a little bit better than Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored)'s general score of 74.8. Motorola One Zoom features an extremely better CPU than Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Motorola One Zoom counts with a much more vibrant display than Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), although it has a little bit smaller display.
The Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored) has a slightly better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored) counts with a little longer battery duration than Motorola One Zoom, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Motorola One Zoom shoots better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), because although it has a camera with lesser mega pixels and a lot tinier sensor capturing way lower quality videos and images, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better low light photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.