Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| -- | 2019-03-15 |
| -- | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 5.86 ounces |
| Crafted Black, Navy, Pink, Silver Shadow and White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| -- | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 403 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.57") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), with a global score of 83.8 against 74.8. Galaxy A50 features a lot better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), although it has 8 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Galaxy A50 counts with a way better screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), although it has a quite smaller screen.
The Galaxy A50 shoots clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), because although it has a much tinier back camera sensor which gives a lot lower photo and video quality and a back camera with a much lower 25 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture for better images and videos in poorly lited situations.
Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a bit more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored) has a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 4400mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.