Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| -- | 2020-08-21 |
| -- | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.84 ounces |
| Crafted Black, Navy, Pink, Silver Shadow and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| -- | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.57") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 is a lot better than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), having a score of 90.8 against 74.8. Galaxy Note 20 has a very superior processing unit than Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a way better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), although it has a quite smaller screen.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 captures slightly better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), although it has a tinier camera sensor which offers a lower photo and video quality and a much less mega pixels resolution back facing camera, they both have a F1.8 camera aperture. Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored) counts with a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note 20, because it has more internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored) has a little longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 4400mAh battery size against 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.