Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| -- | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 5.75 ounces |
| Crafted Black, Navy, Pink, Silver Shadow and White | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| -- | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 568 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.57") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S9 has an overall score of 83.3, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored)'s 74.8 overall score. The Galaxy S9 has a much sharper screen than Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), although it has a really smaller display. Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored) counts with a better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S9, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a very superior processing power than Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), although it has 8 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored) features a superior battery duration than Galaxy S9, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 features a slightly better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), because although it has a way tinier back camera sensor which offers a much lower image and video quality and a back-facing camera with a way lower 12 MP resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better photos in low-light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.