Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 15 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-20 |
| -- | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.02 ounces |
| Crafted Black, Navy, Pink, Silver Shadow and White | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| -- | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| -- | 396 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.57") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has an overall score of 76.6, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored)'s score of 74.8. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has older 10 version while Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored) has Android 15. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a very superior processing unit than Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), although it has 9 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features a lot better display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), although it has a bit smaller display. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 shoots clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), although it has a back facing camera with less MP resolution and a lot tinier sensor which gives a lot lower image and video quality, they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture.
Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored) counts with much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.