Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-04-07 |
| -- | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.37 ounces |
| Crafted Black, Navy, Pink, Silver Shadow and White | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| -- | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.57") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a general score of 79, which is a bit better than Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored)'s 74.8 score. These phones have Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has the older 11 version and Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored) has Android 15 version. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a much sharper display than Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), although it has a little bit smaller display.
Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored) counts with a bigger memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a much better performing processing unit than Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), although it has a lot tinier back camera sensor giving a much lower image quality and a back-facing camera with a worse 48 MP resolution, they both have a same size aperture. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features just a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), because it has a 14% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.